7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2022-02-09
Summary
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RIRS) is the first-line treatment for 1-2 cm upper urinary tract stones, and the stone clearance rate can reach 81.4% - 92.5%. Fever after RIRS is the most common infection after RIRS, and its incidence is up to 20%. The incidence rate of systemic inflammatory response syndrome is 6.5% - 10.3%, sepsis 0.1% - 4.3%, with the infection progressed. If there is no timely and effective intervention in the early stage of urogenic sepsis, it can progress to septic shock, and the mortality can be as high as 30% - 40%. High intrarenal pressure is an important risk factor for postoperative infection. American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines point out that controlling intrarenal pressure at an appropriate level is particularly important to prevent postoperative infection.
The use of ureteroscopic sheath in ureteroscopic surgery can effectively reduce the intrarenal pressure, which is an important measure to reduce the incidence of postoperative infection. Theoretically, the larger the space, the better the reflux effect and the lower the incidence of postoperative infection. The study showed that the incidence of ureteral sheath infection was significantly lower than that of ureteral sheath infection after operation. When using the same caliber ureteroscopic sheath, use a smaller caliber ureteroscopy to increase the space between the ureteroscopy and the ureteral sheath, promote reflux, reduce intrarenal pressure and reduce the incidence of postoperative infection. However, there is still a lack of relevant research on the effect of different caliber ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculi on postoperative infection.
Conditions
- Kidney Stones
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
7.5fr ultra-fine ureteroscopy
The patient placed the lithotomy position, placed the ureteroscope to explore the affected ureter, retrogradely placed the guide wire, and placed the 12 / 14fr ureteral sheath under X-ray monitoring until the affected ureter was close to the outlet of the renal pelvis. Group 1 patients used 7.5fr ultra-fine ureteroscopy
- PROCEDURE
-
9.2fr Ureteroscopy
The patient placed the lithotomy position, placed the ureteroscope to explore the affected ureter, retrogradely placed the guide wire, and placed the 12 / 14fr ureteral sheath under X-ray monitoring until the affected ureter was close to the outlet of the renal pelvis. Group 2 patients used 9.2fr Ureteroscopy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Guohua Zeng, Ph.D & MD · The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-02-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-08-31
- Completion
- 2022-08-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Intelligent Pressure and Temperature Control Ureteral Soft Scope System for Treating Stones With Infection.
NCT06841523 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Resistance During UAS Insertion Procedure in RIRS
NCT03919227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Outcomes and Costs in Using the Shenzhen HugeMed 6.3 French Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT07296835 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible vs Semi-rigid URS
NCT07247617 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure
NCT02734914 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prediction of Sepsis After Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT04157452 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope vs Nondisposable Fiber Optic vs Digital Ureteroscope
NCT03220516 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN