Evaluation of Implant Abutment-Level Digitalization Techniques
NCT07466355 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12
Last updated 2026-03-12
Summary
This methodological clinical study aims to evaluate digital workflows used for the intraoral digitalization of cement-retained implant abutments in situations where implant impression components are unavailable and abutment replacement is not feasible. Three digital impression workflows were compared through quantitative analysis of three-dimensional implant positions derived from digital datasets obtained using scan bodies and abutment-level scans. Implant positions were defined by virtual implant axes and analyzed using reverse engineering software. The study evaluates whether combined intraoral-extraoral abutment scanning provides comparable accuracy to direct intraoral abutment scanning.
Conditions
- Prosthesis User, Digitalism
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Digital workflows using an intraoral scanner (TRIOS, 3Shape)
In this clinical study, three digital workflows were applied to each participant for the digitalization of cement-retained implant abutments. All digital impressions were obtained using an intraoral scanner (TRIOS, 3Shape). The workflows included: (1) intraoral scanning using the original scan body (Straumann), (2) direct intraoral scanning of the cement-retained abutment, and (3) a combined workflow involving intraoral and extraoral scanning of the abutment followed by best-fit alignment. Three-dimensional implant positions were defined by virtual implant axes derived from the digital datasets. Angular deviation analysis was performed using reverse engineering software to compare implant position outcomes among the digital workflows.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hacettepe University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kıvanç Akça, DDS, PhD · Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-03-21
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-29
- Completion
- 2025-10-14
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Trueness of Full Arch Scans and Generated Digital Implant Models
NCT06281002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing the Influence of Implant Scanning Techniques on the Accuracy of Maxillary Complete-Arch Digital Scans for Implant Overdentures: A Comparative Clinical Study
NCT07295899 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Accuracy of Intraoral Scan Post-processing Methods: A Clinical Trial
NCT07295964 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Analysis of Occlusal Force Distribution in Single-Tooth Implant Restorations
NCT06862973 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Digital Intraoral Scanning With and Without Prefabricated Landmarks Versus Conventional Impression Technique
NCT06592066 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Implant Impression Techniques
NCT04908618 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Conventional and Digital Workflow in Dental Prosthesis
NCT06215781 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Passive Fit and Time Efficiency in All On-X Implants Protocols Using Photogrammetry, Splinted Scan Bodies, and Conventional Impression Technique
NCT07235072 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cementation Techniques for Single-tooth Implant Crowns
NCT03581565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis
NCT04475913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Technique to Analyze the Wear of Implants and Natural Tooth as Antagonist.
NCT05842655 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Accuracy of Direct Digital Scanning for All on Four Implants in Comparison to a Custom-made Verification Jig in Fully Edentulous Patients
NCT07106177 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Digitalized Impression on Single Peri-implant Soft Tissue Profile
NCT06702969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis
NCT05912725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs Conventional Impressions Study
NCT03146780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Two Methods of Making Impressions for Complete-arch Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis
NCT06343441 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Scan Time and Prosthetic Complications of Intraoral Scanning Versus Intraoral Photogrammetry for Full-Arch Titanium Framework With Zirconia Overlay Implant Screw-Retained Prostheses
NCT07446790 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Accuracy of Three-Dimensionally Guided Zygomatic Implant Installation
NCT07463469 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Artificial Intelligence Versus Conventional Digital Design for Fixed Dental Prosthesis
NCT07432165 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Research on the Development and Clinical Evaluation of Biomimetic Abutments
NCT06870955 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Passive Fit of Implant-Supported Complete-Arch Prostheses Using Digital Workflows
NCT07315620 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of a Fully Digital Workflow in Immediate Implants With Immediate Restoration
NCT07294820 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Accuracy of Scannable Healing Abutments for Implant Impressions
NCT07393269 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Impression Technique in Mandibular Arch
NCT05770011 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Digital Versus Static Jaw Relation Record on Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants Supporting Maxillary Single Overdenture
NCT06965517 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA