MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Conventional and Digital Workflow in Dental Prosthesis

NCT06215781 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-01-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this comparative RCT is to evaluate the differences between the entire digital, the combined digital-analogic and the entire analogic workflows of implant-supported and teeth-supported prostheses. It is a three-arms comparative study. The 60 patients are divided into three groups:

* fully digital workflow
* combined digital and conventional workflow
* fully conventional workflow For each patients were evaluated the interproximal (IC) and occlusal contact (OC) and impression time (IT) and the patient satisfaction through a VAS scale.

The null hypothesis is that are no differences between the three groups for each parameter.

Conditions

  • Dental Prosthesis Complication

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Fully digital workflow of prosthetic fixed dental crown

The intervention that was administered was a full digital workflow. It includes an initial digital planning, an optical impression with intraoral scanner and a CAD-CAM milled zirconia crown. No analog materials were used.

PROCEDURE

Combined digital and conventional workflows of prosthetic fixed dental crown

The intervention that was administered was a combined digital and traditional workflow. The initial planning was digital, then the impression was performed with analog impression material (silicones) and the final zirconia crown was CAD-CAM milled, with a digital procedure.

PROCEDURE

Fully conventional workflow of prosthetic fixed dental crown

The intervention that was administered was a conventional workflow that doesn't provide any digital step. The impression was taken with analog material (silicones) and the final prosthesis was a metal-ceramic crown, realized on plaster cast.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Massimo Corsalini, Prof. · Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro"

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-07
Primary Completion
2023-09-01
Completion
2023-12-01

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06215781 on ClinicalTrials.gov