MedTrace Logo

Digital vs Conventional Impression in Capturing the Emergence Profile Around Maxillary Anterior Implant-supported Crowns

NCT06425770 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 15

Last updated 2024-05-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compares conventional impression and cast fabrication to direct/indirect digital scannig and 3D printed casts regarding their accuracy in replicating the peri-implant emergence profile of single implants in the maxillary anterior region (FDI #15-25).

Conditions

  • Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
  • Dental Impression Technique

Interventions

PROCEDURE

indirect digital impression and 3D printed cast

the provisional restoration will be scanned with intraoral scanner extraorally, based on which a virtual model will be created, from which a 3D printed cast will be created with manually fabricated gingival mask based on the provisional restoration

PROCEDURE

direct digital impression

the emergence profile will be directly scanned with intraoral scanner at 0, 2, 10, and 20 minutes after removing the provisional restoration

PROCEDURE

conventional impresion and cast

conventional impression with elastomer (silicon), from which a high-precision epoxi-resin cast with gingival mask will be created

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Semmelweis University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Krisztina Mikulás, PhD · Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-10-05
Primary Completion
2025-02-01
Completion
2026-02-01

Countries

  • Hungary

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06425770 on ClinicalTrials.gov