MedTrace Logo

Socket Shield vs Conventional Immediate Implant

NCT03587597 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12

Last updated 2019-02-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

eighteen implants will be placed in patients with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the aesthetic area.the recruited patients will be divided into two groups .group 1 will undergo socket shield technique with immediate temporization ,while group 2 will undergo conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. to compare bone loss and aesthetic outcomes in the two techniques.

Conditions

  • Preservation of the Labial Bone

Interventions

PROCEDURE

socket shield technique

socket shield technique with immediate temporization

PROCEDURE

conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization

conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
25 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-05-15
Primary Completion
2019-11-30
Completion
2019-12-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03587597 on ClinicalTrials.gov