MedTrace Logo

The Effect of Two Different Teaching Approaches in Nursing Skills Training

NCT06509178 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 217

Last updated 2024-07-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is effectiveness of Peyton 4-step teaching method and Halsted method on nursing students. The research was conducted as a randomized controlled experimental study with first-year nursing students on urinary catheter within the scope of the Nursing Fundamentals course of Sakarya University Health Sciences Institute. The result of Personal Information Form, Self-Directed Learning Scale in Clinical Nursing Practice, Stress and Satisfaction Vas Scale, Urinary Catheterization Success Pre and Post-Test and Urinary Catheter Application Skill Checklist were comperisoned.

Conditions

  • Urinary Retention

Interventions

OTHER

Peyton group

The same procedures were applied to the students in the experimental group as the students in the control group, except for laboratory applications. Students were asked to watch the video contents after the theoretical course, and in the laboratory practice, sterile urinary catheter application was taught to the students according to Peyton's 4-step approach. Before the skill demonstration, students were given information about the research. Students were given 15-20 minutes to fill out the voluntary consent form and the urinary catheterization success pre-test. Students were taught the sterile urinary catheter procedure in accordance with Peyton's 4-step approach.The research was conducted on the days and hours of the students' laboratory days. The data collection phase of the research took 3 weeks in total.

OTHER

Halsed group

After the control group students attended the course in accordance with the routine procedures, the students were asked to watch videos of the online urinary catheter application course and the students were taught how to apply sterile urinary catheter using the Halsted method (see one and do it), which is traditionally used in laboratory practice. Students were informed about the research and voluntary consent forms were obtained. Students were given 15-20 minutes to complete the urinary catheterization success pre-test. During the demonstration, the students' questions were answered, the researcher went over the points that the student did not understand, corrected any incorrect behavior, and gave feedback. Afterwards, each student was asked to demonstrate the skill steps individually.The research was conducted on the days and hours of the students' laboratory days. The data collection phase of the research took 3 weeks in total.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sakarya University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Özlem Doğu · Sakarya University Faculty of Health Sciences

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
26 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-04-01
Primary Completion
2022-05-14
Completion
2023-06-16

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06509178 on ClinicalTrials.gov