Comparative Clinical Evaluation Between a Novel Self Adhesive and Conventional Bulk-fill Composites
NCT06120868 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32
Last updated 2023-11-07
Summary
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of a novel, tooth-colored, self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative, and a conventional bulk-fill composite, for restoring class II cavities.
Conditions
- Class II Dental Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Surefil one®
For Surefil one® restorations, the capsule will be activated by pressing it against a stable surface, then mixed in a capsule mixer for 10 s. The capsule tip will be inserted into the proximal box, and the material is extruded as the tip is gradually moved in a coronal direction, ensuring that the material adapts to the cavity bottom and walls.
- OTHER
-
Filtek One
Scotchbond™ Universal (SBU) will be used as an adhesive system in self-etch mode for FiltekTM One restoration. SBU will be applied actively for 20 seconds with a disposable brush tip, air-dried gently for 5 seconds to create a consistent bond thickness, then light-cured for 10 seconds. The FiltekTM One will be packed in increments up to 4 mm thick. A second layer of FiltekTM One will be applied on top of the first 4-mm layer if 4 mm is not adequate to properly restore the tooth. Each increment will be light cured for 20 seconds.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Nourhan M.Aly
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mohamed S Ellithy, BDS · Alexandria University
-
Rania R Afifi, PhD · Alexandria University
-
Mohamed H Hussein, PhD · Alexandria University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- SEQUENTIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-07-10
- Primary Completion
- 2023-09-01
- Completion
- 2023-09-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Composite Restorations on Posterior Teeth
NCT06226389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials
NCT07320885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One-Step Universal Adhesives: A 3-year Clinical Trial in Class II Composite Restorations
NCT06265116 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Novel Self-Adhesive Composite Hybrid Versus Conventional Composite in Restoration of Carious Primary Teeth.
NCT05173753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Teeth Using Conventional and Bulkfill Composites
NCT06852586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bulk-fill Restorations in Class II Cavities
NCT06461364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative in Class I and II Restorations
NCT03764059 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of An Alkasite Based Restorative Material With And Without Adhesive
NCT06273410 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System
NCT03343184 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Repeated Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT05383768 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of "Snow-plow"Technique Versus Bulk Fill Technique in Restorations of Class II Cavities
NCT04943120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill and Incremental Composite
NCT04685954 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Composites With Incrementally Layered Conventional Composites
NCT07078110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT04306549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Functional Properties of Two Injectable Materials in Posterior Teeth: Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06894186 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Nusmile Bioflex Versus Stainless-Steel Crowns in Restoring Decayed Primary Molars with Modified Hall Technique
NCT06721741 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult With Class V Carious
NCT04716517 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA