Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult With Class V Carious
NCT04716517 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2021-07-28
Summary
Cention N will have the same clinical performance as resin-modified glass ionomer in cervical carious lesions. Evaluation of restorations will be done at baseline, six months, and one year according (USPHS) criteria.
Conditions
- Cervical Lesion
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Alkasite bioactive restorative material.
Alkasite restorative is a category of filling material, like compomer, and is essentially a subgroup of the composite resin. Cention N is a urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-based, self-curing powder/liquid restorative with optional additional light curing. The liquid comprises of dimethacrylates and initiators, while the powder contains various glass fillers, initiators, and pigments. It is radio opaque and contains alkaline glass fillers capable of releasing fluoride, calcium, and hydroxide ions. Due to the sole use of cross-linking methacrylate monomers in combination with a stable, efficient self-cure initiator, Cention N displays a high polymer network density and degree of polymerization over the complete depth of the restoration.
- OTHER
-
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer
The resin-modified glass ionomer materials are hybrid materials of traditional glass ionomer cement with a small addition of light-curing resin, and hence exhibit properties intermediate to the two, with some characteristics superior to conventional glass ionomer materials
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-11-01
- Completion
- 2022-12-01
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Performance of ARS Containing Universal Adhesives in Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT06572124 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions With Different Resin Composites and Universal Adhesive
NCT06393699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material
NCT06317857 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Shade Matching Potential of Universal Shade Resin Composite Materials Compared to Multi Shade Resin Composite in Restoration of Carious Cervical Lesions in Anterior Teeth
NCT05465850 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cervical Restorations Performance Using Modified Universal Adhesive
NCT05509127 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Bulk-fill Restorations in Class II Cavities
NCT06461364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Remineralization of Early Carious Lesion Using Natural Agents Versus Bioadhesive Polymers
NCT04390256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Restorative Material in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT05593159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Zirconia Reinforced GI Versus Conventional Viscous GI in Geriatric Patients
NCT04298151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities
NCT04738604 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT
NCT04053530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Reinforced Glass Ionomer Restorations
NCT04288791 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Desensitizing Effect and Tooth Color Change After Using Giomer-based Varnish Versus Bioactive Glass Air Polishing in Treating Cervical Hypersensitive Lesions
NCT05981625 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA