Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2023-11-18
Summary
This study (a double-blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial) aimed to evaluate 2-year clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites in Class ӀӀ restorations.
The null hypothesis tested in this study was that, there would be no difference in the 2-year clinical performance of all tested bulk-fill resin composites in Class II restorations.
Forty patients were enrolled in the study. Each patient received three bulk-fill resin composites Class ӀӀ restorations. One dual-cure and two light-cure bulk-fill resin composites were used for Class ӀӀ restorations following manufacturer's instructions. A universal adhesive was used with all restorations. All restorations were clinically evaluated after 1 week (baseline), 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and finally after 24 months using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria.
Conditions
- Dental Caries Class II
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Fill-Up Class ӀӀ restoration
Bulk-fill technique
- PROCEDURE
-
QuiXfil Class ӀӀ restoration
Bulk-fill technique
- PROCEDURE
-
Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill Class ӀӀ restoration
Bulk-fill technique
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-08-04
- Primary Completion
- 2022-08-20
- Completion
- 2022-08-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance Of Class I Composite Restorations After Cavity Finishing By Air Abrasion Versus Diamond Stone
NCT06107218 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation Between a Novel Self Adhesive and Conventional Bulk-fill Composites
NCT06120868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Different Methods of Resin Composite Application In Class II Restorations
NCT02185573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One-Step Universal Adhesives: A 3-year Clinical Trial in Class II Composite Restorations
NCT06265116 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Highly Filled Injectable Flowable Composite for Direct Posterior Occlusal Conservative Restorations Using FDI Criteria: Two Year Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06790511 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Bulk-fill Restorations in Class II Cavities
NCT06461364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT06212141 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Comparing Between Two Different Restoration
NCT05556551 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Based Restorative System Versus Bulk Filled Resin-based Composite
NCT02479711 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill Restorative and Nano-fill Resin Composite
NCT04320576 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA