MedTrace Logo

Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations

NCT03608306 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2018-08-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Clinical performance of bioactive restorative material versus glass hybrid restorative in posterior restorations of high caries risk patients will be evaluated over 12 months using Fédération Dentaire Internationale' (FDI) clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations

Conditions

  • Dental Restoration Failure

Interventions

OTHER

Resin-modified glass ionomer

enhanced RMGIs with an ionic resin matrix, a shock-absorbing resin component, and bioactive fillers that mimic the physical and chemical properties of natural teeth.

OTHER

Bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative

It's a bulk-fill, fluoride-releasing restorative system that combines EQUIA Forte Fil, which is a high strength glass hybrid restorative, and EQUIA Forte Coat, a wear-resistant, self-adhesive, light-cured resin coating.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mai M Yousry, PhD · Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
55 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-10-31
Primary Completion
2020-04-30
Completion
2020-06-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03608306 on ClinicalTrials.gov