Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 56
Last updated 2025-03-05
Summary
the aim of this study is To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Self- Cure Bulk fill Composite Resin Versus Conventional Bulk fill resin composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions over a Period of 24 months Follow-up.
Conditions
- Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
class II restoration
A class II cavity will be prepared after local anesthesia has been given as requierd . Rubber dam isolation will be done. Sectional matricing and wedging will be done. Followed by placement of restorative material according to the randomization sequence.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 100 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-04-30
- Completion
- 2027-05-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Composite Restorations on Posterior Teeth
NCT06226389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Repeated Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT05383768 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Nano Fiber Reinforced Versus Conventional Nano Hybrid Composite in Restoring Premolars
NCT05808075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bulk-fill Restorations in Class II Cavities
NCT06461364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Thermoviscous Bulk Fill Resin Composites in Comparison to Conventional Packable Bulk Fills
NCT05276154 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Rct Deep Margin Elevation by Self Adhesive Composite
NCT06899412 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Treatment of Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT06991582 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation Between a Novel Self Adhesive and Conventional Bulk-fill Composites
NCT06120868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of "Snow-plow"Technique Versus Bulk Fill Technique in Restorations of Class II Cavities
NCT04943120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA