Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2020-07-17
Summary
This clinical trial will be conducted to compare the clinical performance of a new self-adhering flowable composite in restoring CLs compared to conventional flowable composite in geriatric patients over 12 months.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
Interventions
- COMBINATION_PRODUCT
-
Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite
Fusio Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite combines the benefits of adhesive and restorative technology into one product . Immediately upon application Fusio conditions, bonds, and seals without the need for an etchant or an adhesive. It is based on the bonding technology that uses glycerophosphate dimethacrylate(GPDM)to etch enamel and dentin, and hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) to enhance wetting and penetration by resin into dentin.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 60 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2021-09-30
- Completion
- 2021-10-31
More Related Trials
-
Rct Deep Margin Elevation by Self Adhesive Composite
NCT06899412 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions With Different Resin Composites and Universal Adhesive
NCT06393699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Three Different Universal Adhesives in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
NCT03415412 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT
NCT04053530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions at 2 Years
NCT04565938 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Shade Matching Potential of Universal Shade Resin Composite Materials Compared to Multi Shade Resin Composite in Restoration of Carious Cervical Lesions in Anterior Teeth
NCT05465850 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Novel Self-Adhesive Composite Hybrid Versus Conventional Composite in Restoration of Carious Primary Teeth.
NCT05173753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Nusmile Bioflex Versus Stainless-Steel Crowns in Restoring Decayed Primary Molars with Modified Hall Technique
NCT06721741 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Glass Air-abrasion and Non-carious Cervical Lesions
NCT04578717 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin Composites
NCT06375837 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials
NCT07320885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Onlay Restorations After Cervical Margin Relocation (CMR)
NCT06155773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Etching Effect on Application Mode of Universal Adhesive
NCT04814836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Remineralization of Early Carious Lesion Using Natural Agents Versus Bioadhesive Polymers
NCT04390256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations
NCT06956651 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Restorative Material in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT05593159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Zirconia Reinforced GI Versus Conventional Viscous GI in Geriatric Patients
NCT04298151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Full Veneered Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Crowns Cemented With Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Using Two Curing Modes
NCT07043998 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA