Novel Self-Adhesive Composite Hybrid Versus Conventional Composite in Restoration of Carious Primary Teeth.
NCT05173753 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2022-07-27
Summary
The clinical trial aim to evaluate clinical effectiveness of self-adhesive composite hybrid (Surefil one) versus conventional composite(VOCO Grandio) as restorative material for carious primary teeth.
Conditions
- Dental Caries in Children
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Novel self-adhesive hybrid composite(Surefil one)
Surefil one, is a recent introduced esthetic dental restoration for treatment of carious teeth.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kamal Aldin El Motayam, Professor · Cairo University
-
Passant Nagi, PHD · Cairo University
-
Mahitab M Abdel khalek, BDS · Cairo University
-
Fatema H Mohamed, BDS · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 4 Years
- Max Age
- 7 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2022-12-31
- Completion
- 2023-06-30
More Related Trials
-
Primary Molars Restoration Using Different Pediatric Crowns.
NCT04144062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Stainless-Steel, Zirconia and Fiberglass Crowns for Deciduous Molars
NCT06003257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of SI-R21204 Versus Nano-hybrid Resin Composite: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT02823769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of ARS Containing Universal Adhesives in Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT06572124 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Nano Fiber Reinforced Versus Conventional Nano Hybrid Composite in Restoring Premolars
NCT05808075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation of Two Types of Composite Materialsstrip Crown in Primary Molars
NCT05908136 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Treatment of Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT06991582 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Performance and Psychological Impact of Colored Restorations Cement in Primary Molars
NCT05557682 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Amalgam and Hall Technique in Treatment of Carious Primary Teeth
NCT06924203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation Between a Novel Self Adhesive and Conventional Bulk-fill Composites
NCT06120868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Premolars Restored With Ceramic Vonlay Restorations Versus Onlay Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05114122 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Bioflx Crowns vs Stainless Steel Crowns
NCT06396195 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material
NCT06317857 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA