Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Repeated Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite

NCT05383768 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 84

Last updated 2024-05-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical Performance of Posterior Restorations of Bulk Fill Resin Composite without Preheating Versus Repeated Preheating for One, Five and Ten times .The null hypothesis of this study is that there is no significant difference in clinical performance of the restoration during restoring posterior teeth when using bulk-fill without preheating and after repeated preheating for one , five and ten times in restoration of posterior teeth.

Conditions

  • Dental Leakage

Interventions

OTHER

preheated conventional bulk-fill resin composite, X-tra fill (VOCO, GERMANY) at 68◦C

Intervention 1: restoration with one-time preheated conventional bulk-fill resin composite, X-tra fill (VOCO, GERMANY) at 68◦C (Yang et al., 2020). Intervention 2: Restoration with five time preheated conventional bulk-fill resin composite, X-tra fill (VOCO, GERMANY) at 68◦C (Yang et al., 2020). Intervention 3: Restoration with ten time preheated conventional bulk-fill resin composite, X-tra fill (VOCO, GERMANY) at 68◦C (Yang et al., 2020).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-03-01
Primary Completion
2023-04-01
Completion
2023-04-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05383768 on ClinicalTrials.gov