Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Repeated Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT05383768 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 84
Last updated 2024-05-29
Summary
A Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical Performance of Posterior Restorations of Bulk Fill Resin Composite without Preheating Versus Repeated Preheating for One, Five and Ten times .The null hypothesis of this study is that there is no significant difference in clinical performance of the restoration during restoring posterior teeth when using bulk-fill without preheating and after repeated preheating for one , five and ten times in restoration of posterior teeth.
Conditions
- Dental Leakage
Interventions
- OTHER
-
preheated conventional bulk-fill resin composite, X-tra fill (VOCO, GERMANY) at 68◦C
Intervention 1: restoration with one-time preheated conventional bulk-fill resin composite, X-tra fill (VOCO, GERMANY) at 68◦C (Yang et al., 2020). Intervention 2: Restoration with five time preheated conventional bulk-fill resin composite, X-tra fill (VOCO, GERMANY) at 68◦C (Yang et al., 2020). Intervention 3: Restoration with ten time preheated conventional bulk-fill resin composite, X-tra fill (VOCO, GERMANY) at 68◦C (Yang et al., 2020).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-04-01
- Completion
- 2023-04-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Composite Restorations on Posterior Teeth
NCT06226389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Rct Deep Margin Elevation by Self Adhesive Composite
NCT06899412 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT05606874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions With Different Resin Composites and Universal Adhesive
NCT06393699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bulk-fill Restorations in Class II Cavities
NCT06461364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation Between a Novel Self Adhesive and Conventional Bulk-fill Composites
NCT06120868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of "Snow-plow"Technique Versus Bulk Fill Technique in Restorations of Class II Cavities
NCT04943120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT
NCT04053530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Thermoviscous Bulk Fill Resin Composites in Comparison to Conventional Packable Bulk Fills
NCT05276154 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Resin Bulkfill Dual-Cured of Proximal Restoration. Clinical Trial
NCT05013853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials
NCT06109987 ·Status: COMPLETED