Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations

NCT04306549 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25

Last updated 2020-03-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of one microhybrid and two bulk-fill resin composites in Class II cavities for up to two years.

Materials and methods In total, 75 Class II restorations were made in 25 patients, using three restorative materials: two nanohybrid bulk-fill resin composites, Sonic Fill (SF) and x-tra fil (XF), and a microhybrid composite, Filtek Z-250 (FZ). The restorations were blindly evaluated by two examiners at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months, using U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The restoration groups for each category were compared using the Pearson chi-square test, and the Cochran Q-test was used to compare the changes across different time points within each restorative material (p \<0.05).

Conditions

  • Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity

Interventions

OTHER

Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Resins

Clinical Comparison of Composite Restorations (Two Bulk-Fill and one Microhybrid Composite Resin) to the USPHS Criterias

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Beykent

    collaborator OTHER
  • Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
22 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-08-03
Primary Completion
2017-01-03
Completion
2019-01-04

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04306549 on ClinicalTrials.gov