Comparison of Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Teeth Using Conventional and Bulkfill Composites
NCT06852586 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 79
Last updated 2025-02-28
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the onset and severity of pain and postoperative sensitivity in patients after using conventional nanohybrid and bulkfill composites
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference in mean postoperative sensitivity exhibited with conventional nano-hybrid versus bulkfill composites in mandibular molars with class 1 cavity.
Conditions
- Class I Dental Caries
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
conventional nanohybrid composites
Incremental layering technique is used for restoration
- DEVICE
-
Bulk fill composites
Single increment in bulk form is applied for restoration
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
28 Military Dental Centre Lahore
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Zahra Zubair, BDS · 28 Military Dental Centre
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-08-26
- Primary Completion
- 2023-01-30
- Completion
- 2023-01-30
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Performance of GIOMER Based Resin Composite
NCT06021028 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation Between a Novel Self Adhesive and Conventional Bulk-fill Composites
NCT06120868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT04306549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the 2-year Clinical Performances of Class II Restorations Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT06562868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
NCT06596707 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT04565860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nano-Hybrid vs Bulk-Fill Resin Composites
NCT05432258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill Restorative and Nano-fill Resin Composite
NCT04320576 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of the Post Operative Sensitivity of Cention-N(Commercially Available Restorative Material) Using Conventional and Polymer Bur- In-vivo Study
NCT05185206 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill and Incremental Composite
NCT04685954 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cementation Techniques; an In-vitro Study
NCT05875688 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA