Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT05949502 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26
Last updated 2023-07-18
Summary
A clinical trial, comparing the clinical performance and occlusal wear resistance of two different restorative materials in restoring proximal caries in permanent posterior teeth. One is based on giomer technology and the other is nano-hybrid resin composite.
Conditions
- Caries Class II
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Beautifil II LS (Low-Shrinkage)
low shrinkage bioactive material Giomer
- DRUG
-
3M Filtek Z250 XT Universal
Universal Nano-hybrid composite
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2026-02-28
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative
NCT06254053 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Nano Fiber Reinforced Versus Conventional Nano Hybrid Composite in Restoring Premolars
NCT05808075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities
NCT04738604 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT06195449 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
NCT06596707 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Varnish Versus CPP-ACP Varnish in the Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06154941 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Giomer Restoration in Class II Cavities After One Year
NCT06603116 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Based Restorative System Versus Bulk Filled Resin-based Composite
NCT02479711 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Shade Matching Potential of Universal Shade Resin Composite Materials Compared to Multi Shade Resin Composite in Restoration of Carious Cervical Lesions in Anterior Teeth
NCT05465850 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Desensitizing Effect and Tooth Color Change After Using Giomer-based Varnish Versus Bioactive Glass Air Polishing in Treating Cervical Hypersensitive Lesions
NCT05981625 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Shade Matching of Omnichroma (One Shade Universal Composite) Versus a Microhybrid Composite in Class V Restorations.
NCT04129047 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA