Shade Matching Potential of Universal Shade Resin Composite Materials Compared to Multi Shade Resin Composite in Restoration of Carious Cervical Lesions in Anterior Teeth
NCT05465850 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2022-07-20
Summary
The aim of the study is to clinically evaluate the shade matching and clinical performance of the Universal shade composites Omnichroma and GC Essentia versus the multi shade composite Filtek Z350XT in restoring cervical lesions of anterior teeth.
Conditions
- Class V Dental Caries
Interventions
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
Modified USPHS criteria
It assess the restorations with visual inspection using a mirror and explorer. It includes Marginal integrity, shade matching, retention, marginal discoloration, gingival inflammation, and recurrent caries.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2023-08-31
- Completion
- 2023-08-31
More Related Trials
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Shade Evaluation of Monochromatic Versus Polychromatic Layering Techniques Inrestoration of Fractured Incisal Angle
NCT04355208 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endocrowns in Anterior Teeth: Effect of Cementation Protocols and Restorative Materials on the Clinical Performance of the Restorations
NCT05973292 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Performance of ARS Containing Universal Adhesives in Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT06572124 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Selective Versus Stepwise Removal of Deep Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth Using Different Medicaments
NCT06585436 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult With Class V Carious
NCT04716517 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT
NCT04053530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Remineralization of Early Carious Lesion Using Natural Agents Versus Bioadhesive Polymers
NCT04390256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Composite Restorations on Posterior Teeth
NCT06226389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Class IV Restoration Using Organically Modified Ceramic (OMNOCER) in Comparison to a Methacrylate Based Composite Resin
NCT05623423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Color Match Assessment of a Single Shade Structurally Colored Universal Resin Composite
NCT04960852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluate the Shade Matching of Polychromatic Versus Monochromatic Composite Layering Techniques in Fractured Class IV Maxillary Central Incisors Using Universal , Layering & One Shade Composite In-vivo on Patients
NCT06743984 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA