Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2025-06-18
Summary
Using bioactive injectable resin composite in anterior class v carious lesions can provide better aesthetic outcome and marginal integrity by releasing multiple ions, including fluoride. This offers better marginal integrity due to presence of S-PRG fillers
Conditions
- Restoration of Carious Class v Anterior Teeth
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Giomer based injectable composite
Giomers utilize surface pre-reacted glass (SPRG) technology, which involves an acid-base reaction between fluorine-containing glass particles and polymer-containing acid when exposed to water. This reaction results in the formation of a glass ionomer phase, which is then dispersed throughout the resin. Furthermore, the S-PRG fillers present in giomer materials enable the continuous release and replenishment of fluoride, offering long-lasting protection against the recurrence of caries
- PROCEDURE
-
Universal injectable resin composite
Conventional injectable resin composite
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Future University in Egypt
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-06-10
- Primary Completion
- 2026-04-13
- Completion
- 2026-04-13
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Treatment of Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT06991582 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT05949502 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Bulk Filling Flowable Composite on Caries Recurrence in Deep Marginal Elevation: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06900868 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Resin Composite Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth Using Custom 3D Printed Templates
NCT06478004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Evaluation of Three Different Minimally Invasive Techniques for Management of Enamel Opacities in Patients With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization "Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial"
NCT06135272 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
NCT05334901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of ARS Containing Universal Adhesives in Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT06572124 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material
NCT06317857 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Performance of Two Dentine Replacement Materials in Deep Occlusal Cavities (Randomized)
NCT06924047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA