18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations
NCT06956651 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2025-05-18
Summary
The study compares two restorative materials to restore occlusal decay, offering the patients high-strength, high-durability restorations with antibacterial properties.
Conditions
- Occlusal Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
FIT SA
Self Adhesive Flowable giomer restorative material
- OTHER
-
Beautifil Flow Plus F00
Conventional Flowable giomer composite
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-04-30
- Completion
- 2027-04-30
More Related Trials
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Three Universal Adhesives in Posterior Restorations
NCT05696431 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Proximal Contact Quality in Posterior Complex Carious Cavities Restored With Bulk Fill Ormocer and Resin Composite Using a Precontoured Circumferential Matrix System Versus Pre Contoured Sectional Matrix System
NCT05625243 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Full Veneered Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Crowns Cemented With Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Using Two Curing Modes
NCT07043998 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Giomer Pit and Fissure Sealant Applied With or Without Etching
NCT06509451 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Giomer Restoration in Class II Cavities After One Year
NCT06603116 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT05606874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Rct Deep Margin Elevation by Self Adhesive Composite
NCT06899412 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06856070 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
NCT03834636 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of ARS Containing Universal Adhesives in Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT06572124 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative
NCT06254053 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Selective Versus Stepwise Removal of Deep Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth Using Different Medicaments
NCT06585436 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA