Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Molars Restored Using Giomer
NCT06601972 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 122
Last updated 2024-09-19
Summary
Dental manufacturers\' constant tweaks and improvements to composite compositions have resulted in a wider spectrum of restorative materials with positive long-term clinical performance. For example, the creation of bioactive giomer material with proven continuous multi-ion release has been beneficial in avoiding demineralization and imparting acid resistance to enamel and dentin.
Conditions
- Caries, Dental
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Beautifil II LS (Low-Shrinkage)
The most remarkable feature of this light-cured universal composite for anterior and posterior restorations is its unique shrinkage of 0.85 percent by volume
- PROCEDURE
-
Nanohybrid resin composite
Nanohybrid resin composites are the most popular, because they improve the distribution of fillers in the matrix by combining nanoparticles with submicron particles to achieve better mechanical, chemical, and optical properties
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
NewGiza University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-10-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
More Related Trials
-
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations
NCT06956651 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration Repairs Using Composite Resin Versus Glass Ionomer in Primary Molars: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04491981 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Bulk Filling Flowable Composite on Caries Recurrence in Deep Marginal Elevation: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06900868 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three Different Minimally Invasive Techniques for Management of Enamel Opacities in Patients With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization "Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial"
NCT06135272 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restorative Treatment in First Molars Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
NCT02717286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Nano Fiber Reinforced Versus Conventional Nano Hybrid Composite in Restoring Premolars
NCT05808075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Performance of Two Dentine Replacement Materials in Deep Occlusal Cavities (Randomized)
NCT06924047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of SI-R21204 Versus Nano-hybrid Resin Composite: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT02823769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative
NCT06254053 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Hypersensitivity Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial
NCT01268605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
NCT06596707 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 2 Different Resin Based Filling Materials in Posterior Teeth - a Multicenter Study
NCT01925040 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Based Restorative System Versus Bulk Filled Resin-based Composite
NCT02479711 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Assessment of Glass Carbomer Cement
NCT03030690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT06195449 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1