Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 31
Last updated 2016-08-05
Summary
PICOTS:
P: High Caries Risk Patients with bilateral class I cavities. I: Glass Ionomer with Glass Hybrid Technology. C: Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer. O: Clinical performance (Functional properties Biological properties) using (World Dental Federation) Fédération dentaire internationale (FDI) criteria for dental restorations.
T: 1 year. S: Randomized controlled Trial (split mouth design). Research question:In high caries risk patients with class I cavities will glass ionomer with glass hybrid technology has similar clinical performance as conventional high viscosity glass ionomer
Conditions
- Class I Cavities in High Caries Risk
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Conventional high viscosity glass ionomer
Dental restorative material
- OTHER
-
Glass ionomer with glass hybrid technology
Dental restorative material
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Primary Completion
- 2018-09-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Performance of GIOMER Based Resin Composite
NCT06021028 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
NCT06596707 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Giomer Restoration in Class II Cavities After One Year
NCT06603116 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Milled PEEK Indirect Restorations Compared to Hybird Resin Composite Indirect Restorations Over One Year Period of Time ( A Randomized Clinical Trial )
NCT06092697 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT05949502 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Low-shrinkage Giomer Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Caries Lesions: A Clinical Trial
NCT05930548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Reinforced Glass Ionomer Restorations
NCT04288791 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Composite Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Liners: 2-Year Clinical Trial
NCT05470959 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion in Bioflx vs. Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06933927 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Highly Filled Injectable Flowable Composite for Direct Posterior Occlusal Conservative Restorations Using FDI Criteria: Two Year Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06790511 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Treatment of Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT06991582 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA