Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Varnish Versus CPP-ACP Varnish in the Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06154941 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2023-12-04
Summary
Dentin hypersensitivity is a drastic problem, which threaten many dental patients. According to the last published systematic review and meta analysis at 2019, the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity is being 33.5% among the population. Moreover, it was determined that young adults with age range from 18 to 44 years exhibited high percentage (43.9%) of such problem
Conditions
- Dentin Hypersensitivity
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Giomer Varnish
A light-cured Giomer varnish for prolonged hypersensitivity relief. Seals and protects exposed dentinal tubules to prevent pain. Ideal for patients experiencing loss of enamel, gingival recession
- PROCEDURE
-
CPP-ACP varnish
CPP binds to oral surfaces such as teeth, dentin, oral mucosa and biofilm. CPP-ACP Varnish delivers bioavailable calcium and phosphate ions to occlude dentinal tubules treating dentin hypersensitivity
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-06-30
- Completion
- 2024-08-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Evaluation of Giomer Varnish vs Fluoride Varnish as Desensitizing Agents in Teeth With MIH
NCT05542667 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Silver Diamine Fluoride Modified Restoration In Treating Hypomineralized First Permanent Molar.
NCT05931822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT05949502 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation for Post Bleaching Hypersensitivity Using Desensitizing Agent During In-office Bleaching
NCT02942082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance for Recent Non Coated Glass Ionomer in Posterior Teeth
NCT04463342 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Veneer Restorations
NCT05842590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Seashell Nanoparticles and Gluma Desensitizer on Sensitivity of Teeth
NCT06622018 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Resin-Based Desensitizer and Laser, Compared to Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentine Hypersensitivity in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
NCT07113847 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Retention Rate of Giomer Pit and Fissure Sealant Applied With or Without Etching
NCT06509451 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Low-shrinkage Giomer Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Caries Lesions: A Clinical Trial
NCT05930548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Evaluation of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Restoration of Egyptian Posterior Teeth.
NCT05281861 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of an Electrical Impedance Device Versus Digital Radiography in Estimation of Remaining Dentin Thickness
NCT06162182 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Direct and Indirect Composite Restoration in Hypomineralization Molars.
NCT05299489 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-operative Hyper-sensitivity Assessment After Immediate Versus Delayed Dentine Sealing in Teeth for Indirect Tooth Colored Restorations
NCT03562858 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations
NCT06956651 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Treatment of Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT06991582 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2