Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2025-04-13
Summary
Marginal integrity is considered the main essential part of indirect restorations and any discrepancy after cementation and poor marginal fit can lead to microleakage, marginal discoloration, dissolution of cement and secondary caries. The type of cement used plays an important role and can govern the amount of augmentation in discrepancy after cementation.
Although resin cement is still the gold standard luting agent for the cementation of all indirect restoration, it lacks some properties that may be available in the restorative resin composite such as higher filler loading, higher mechanical properties and wear resistance.
may have been the first to propose the use of restorative, flowable resin composite as a luting agent for ceramic inlays. These authors demonstrated that with respect to polymerization rate, there were no advantages of dual curing-resin compared to light curing only. In addition, the overall handling of the light-curing flowable restorative resin composite was judged to be easier than that of the dual cured material. The same conclusions were drawn by Kramer and franken Berger who added that less luting resin composite overhangs were found with the light polymerized composite-resin because the clinician has more time for excess removal prior to polymerization. The claimed further potential advantages of using restorative rein composite as a luting agent is their resistance to wear which proved to be superior to resin cements
Conditions
- Cementation Teeth
- Badly Broken Down Vital Teeth
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Injectable restorative resin composite
The introduction of injectable composites, according to available literature, offers a simple and efficient solution for the cementation of veneers. This versatile, injectable restorative composite unites easy handling, high physical properties and excellent aesthetics. Generally used as a restorative material, it can also be used for the cementation of veneers and some inlays/onlays, thus considered as good alternative to preheated composite. (Alajrash MM et al., 2020)
- OTHER
-
Dual cured resin cement
Resin cements are widely used due to their strong adhesion, and compatibility with various restorative materials, including ceramics and zirconia. They bond to enamel and dentin through functional monomers such as MDP, and 4-META, forming a stable hybrid layer. Based on their bonding mechanism, resin cements are classified as adhesive or self-adhesive, while their polymerization method -chemical, light, or dual-cure-allows for versatility in clinical applications
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 22 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-01-30
- Completion
- 2025-02-28
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Versus Indirect Endocrowns on Endodontically Treated Molars
NCT06934460 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of GIOMER Based Resin Composite
NCT06021028 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Composites
NCT06667271 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Permanent Molars Affected With (MIH) Using Composite Restorations or Preformed Metal Crowns
NCT04658602 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Veneer Restorations
NCT05842590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Indirect Full Coverage Restorations Compared to Direct Composite Resin Restorations
NCT04249726 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Evaluation of Low-shrinkage Giomer Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Caries Lesions: A Clinical Trial
NCT05930548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Direct and Indirect Composite Restoration in Hypomineralization Molars.
NCT05299489 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bulk-fill Restorations in Class II Cavities
NCT06461364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Cad-cam Fabricated Ceramic Restoration in Teeth Affected With MIH
NCT05434884 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Photobiomodulation and New Restorative Material for Teeth With MIH on Control of Hypersensitivity and Longevity
NCT06538142 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Conservative Versus Conventional Ceramic Onlays
NCT05250232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT06195449 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restorative Treatment in First Molars Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
NCT02717286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pulpal Complications in Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Without Glass-ionomer Cement Lining
NCT01567514 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Reliability of Light Induced Fluorescence Intraoral Camera Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Assessment of Marginal Integrity of Resin Composite Restorations: Diagnostic Invivo Study
NCT03090061 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA