Understanding Food Choices in Saudi Arabia

NCT05007184 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 656

Last updated 2021-08-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Using a 3-arm randomized controlled trial, the investigators aim to rigorously evaluate the effects of two front-of-pack (FOP) food labels on diet quality. The first food label is a modified version of Chilean warning FOP label and the second food label is a modified version of French FOP label, Nutri-Score. The investigators used an experimental online grocery store, called NUSMart, which is similar in design to commercial web-based grocery stores to test these two FOP labels. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the following arms and asked to complete a one-time hypothetical shop.

Arm 1: Participants experienced a default version of NUSMart which replicated the traditional shopping experience of online grocery stores with no FOP labels (Control).

Arm 2: Same as Arm 1 NUSMart except that Chilean warning FOP labels were displayed on less healthy food and beverages. Products with specific nutrients (i.e. sugar, sodium, saturated fat, energy) falling outside the bounds of the thresholds defined by the Chilean warning labels were depicted with the warning labels on them.

Arm 3: Same as Arm 1 NUSMart except that Nutri-Score FOP labels along with % sugar per serving were displayed on all food and beverages. These labels score products on the basis of 7 nutrients (calories, saturated fats, sugar, salt, fibre, protein and percentage of fruits, vegetables and nuts) from A to E (best to worst). To ensure that participants understood what Nutri-Score labels mean and how they work, an introductory video was shown before shopping.

The investigators hypothesize the following:

Hypothesis 1: Diet quality, as measured by weighted average Nutri-Score point of shoppers' final baskets, will be greatest in Arm 3, followed by Arm 2, followed by Control.

Hypothesis 2: Grams of sugar per serving/ milligrams of sodium per serving/ grams of saturated fat per serving/ calories per serving will be least in Arm 2, followed by Arm 3, followed by Control.

Conditions

  • Diet Quality

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Chilean Warning Labels

These labels were implemented in Chile in 2016. They are shown on those less-healthy food and beverage products that do not fall within thresholds that are defined for the following nutrients: sugar, sodium, calories and saturated fats. The original labels are in Spanish but the ones that we displayed were in Arabic.

BEHAVIORAL

Nutri-Score Labels

These labels were implemented by the French government in 2017. They are shown on all food and beverage products and range from A to E with the corresponding colours moving from Green to Red (symbolizing best to worst). The scores and grades are calculated based on 7 different nutrients grouped into 2 categories i.e. nutrients to consume (such as fibre) and nutrients to avoid (such as sugar). We modified the labels by adding % sugar per serving on the right side of the labels.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • World Bank

    collaborator OTHER
  • Public Health Authority of Saudi Arabia

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Eric A Finkelstein, PhD MHA · Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-07-07
Primary Completion
2021-07-26
Completion
2021-07-26

Countries

  • Singapore

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05007184 on ClinicalTrials.gov