Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2023-02-09
Summary
This study aims to compare the clinical performance of conserved chalky white demineralized enamel margins with total removal of demineralized enamel margins in class v cavities restored with composite in patients with acute carious cervical lesions
Conditions
- Class V Dental Caries
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities
during cavity preparation, we conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities and then restored them with resin composite restorations,we assessed the restorations with visual inspection using a mirror and explorer according to USPHS Criteria
- PROCEDURE
-
Total removal of demineralized enamel margins of class V cavities
during cavity preparation, we removed the total chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities and then restored them with resin composite restorations, we assessed the restorations with visual inspection using a mirror and explorer according to USPHS Criteria
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 25 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-11-04
- Primary Completion
- 2023-03-31
- Completion
- 2023-05-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT05606874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of ARS Containing Universal Adhesives in Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT06572124 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Low-shrinkage Giomer Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Caries Lesions: A Clinical Trial
NCT05930548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult With Class V Carious
NCT04716517 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Premolars Restored With Ceramic Vonlay Restorations Versus Onlay Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05114122 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Remineralization of Caries Affected Dentin
NCT04262076 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Composite Restorations on Posterior Teeth
NCT06226389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Onlay Restorations After Cervical Margin Relocation (CMR)
NCT06155773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Endocrowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpally-treated Primary Molars
NCT04909827 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
NCT06596707 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Fiber Reinforced Composite Resin Space Maintainer Modified With Silver Nano Particles
NCT05902975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA