Clinical Performance of Onlay Restorations After Cervical Margin Relocation (CMR)
NCT06155773 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64
Last updated 2023-12-08
Summary
The current study intends to evaluate the effect of cervical margin relocation with different restorative materials on three-year clinical performance of indirect Computer-Aided-Design (CAD)/ Computer-Aided-Manufacture (CAM) onlay restorations. This study is designed to test the null hypothesis that the three-year clinical performance of onlay restorations is significantly affected by cervical margin relocation with different restorative materials.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Highly viscous glass ionomer (cervical margin relocation)
different dental restorative materials used to relocate deep cervical margins before receiving onlay restorations
- PROCEDURE
-
Low shrinkage Flowable Composite (cervical margin relocation)
different dental restorative materials used to relocate deep cervical margins before receiving onlay restorations
- PROCEDURE
-
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer (cervical margin relocation)
different dental restorative materials used to relocate deep cervical margins before receiving onlay restorations
- PROCEDURE
-
Bioactive Ionic Resin (cervical margin relocation)
different dental restorative materials used to relocate deep cervical margins before receiving onlay restorations
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-08-24
- Primary Completion
- 2022-01-05
- Completion
- 2025-01-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Influences of Gingival Cord Retractor in Retention Rate of Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restorations.
NCT02961049 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of the Effect of Deep Margin Elevation Technique on the Clinical Performance of Endocrown Restorations Produced by Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) System
NCT06222918 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Low-shrinkage Giomer Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Caries Lesions: A Clinical Trial
NCT05930548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A I in the Prediction of Clinical Performance, Marginal Fit and Fracture Resistance of Vertical Versus Horizontal Margin Designs Fabricated With 2 Ceramic Materials
NCT06164002 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three Different Minimally Invasive Techniques for Management of Enamel Opacities in Patients With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization "Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial"
NCT06135272 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Glass Hybrid Versus Composite Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions
NCT02631161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endocrowns in Anterior Teeth: Effect of Cementation Protocols and Restorative Materials on the Clinical Performance of the Restorations
NCT05973292 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Retrospective Evaluation of RMGI/GI Class V Restorations
NCT04401618 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Nusmile Bioflex Versus Stainless-Steel Crowns in Restoring Decayed Primary Molars with Modified Hall Technique
NCT06721741 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Restorative Material in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT05593159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
36-Month Clinical Performance of Different Restorative Materials in the Treatment of Root Caries Lesions
NCT03722758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Hybrid Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Onlay Restorations
NCT07092163 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation of CAD-CAM Crowns With and Without Deep Margin Elevation
NCT06114030 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
NCT06596707 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dentin Treatments for Restorations of Cervical Lesions Non-Carious
NCT02434601 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
The Effect of Material Choice on Clinical Outcomes in Deep Margin Elevation
NCT07234266 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT
NCT04053530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Versus CAD/CAM Milled Onlays
NCT06774560 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA