MedTrace Logo

Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin Composites

NCT06375837 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 33

Last updated 2025-12-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The clinical performance of an an alkasite-based restorative material and two different resin composites will be evaluated and compared in non-carious cervical lesions. After recruiting participants with at least three non-carious cervical lesions, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. Lesions will be divided in three groups: an alkasite-based restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein (CN)), hybrid resin composite (Gradia Direct Anterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GD)) and a highly filled flowable resin composite ((G-aenial Universal Flo, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GF)). All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using FDI criteria. Descriptive statistics will be performed using chi-square tests.

Conditions

  • Tooth Diseases

Interventions

DEVICE

an alkasite-based restorative material

Cention N

DEVICE

hybrid resin composite

Gradia Direct Anterior

DEVICE

a highly filled flowable resin composite

G-aenial Universal Flo

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hacettepe University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-15
Primary Completion
2024-06-15
Completion
2026-06-15

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06375837 on ClinicalTrials.gov