One Year Clinical Evaluation of Milled BioHPP Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-Based Versus Metal Ceramic Single Crowns
NCT03685513 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46
Last updated 2018-09-26
Summary
Although the metal-ceramic system is still widely used to fabricate crowns and fixed partial dentures and is considered as the standard treatment in dentistry, aesthetic concerns have stimulated the development of new dental tooth-colored systems as PEEK.
BioHPP PEEK is 20% ceramic reinforced, semicrystalline, thermoplastic and radiolucent polymer for extreme durability especially for frameworks for fixed and removable dental prostheses. It has many advantages as low density, light weight, shock absorber, biocompatible and venerable with composite resin.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of milled BioHPP PEEK-based single crowns and compare them to metal-based single crowns.
Conditions
- Single Posterior Crowns
- Badly Decayed Teeth, Teeth Restored With Large Filling Restorations or Endodontically Treated Teeth
- Malformed Teeth, Malposed Teeth (Tilted, Over-erupted, Rotated, Etc.) or Spacing Between Posterior Teeth
Interventions
- OTHER
-
BioHPP PEEK-based single posterior crowns
BioHPP PEEK is 20% ceramic reinforced, semicrystalline, thermoplastic and radiolucent polymer for extreme durability especially for frameworks for fixed and removable dental prostheses. It has many advantages as low density, light weight, shock absorber, biocompatible and venerable with composite resin.
- OTHER
-
Metal ceramic single posterior crowns
Standard metal coping veneered with glass ceramics
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-01-01
- Completion
- 2020-06-01
More Related Trials
-
One-piece and Two-piece Zirconia Abutments in Single Implant Crowns in Esthetic Region
NCT05583123 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Porcelain-fused and IPS e.Max CAD Crowns
NCT01835821 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Nobel Procera Crown Shaded Zirconia and NobelProceraTM Full Contour Crown IPS e.Max CAD
NCT02188212 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Periodontal Health of Abutment Teeth
NCT03777345 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Tooth-Colored Onlays With Cervical Margin Relocation
NCT07157410 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Aesthetic Outcome of Lithium Disilicate (e.Max) All Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments in the Aesthetic Zone After Different Color Masking Approaches
NCT03686267 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Implant Prosthetic Pathways
NCT02905838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Characteristics and Clinical Performance of Lithium Silicate Versus Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
NCT03530020 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic Outcome of 3D Printed Hybrid Ceramics as Final Restorations for Single Screw Retained Implant.
NCT07154602 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Biting Force of Injection Molded PEEK and Bre.Flex for Removable Partial Dentures.
NCT03038737 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
the Peri-implant Tissue Changes Around Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Demineralized Dentin Graft vs Xenograft
NCT06164353 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pink and White Esthetic Scores of Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network and Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns
NCT03220321 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Cad Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (Peek) Partial Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Cases
NCT06789627 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of BioFlx, Zirconia, and Stainless-Steel Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06450093 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single-retainer Lithium Di-silicate Versus Zirconia Resin Bonded Bridge for Replacement of an Anterior Missing Tooth.
NCT05861921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus PFM Implant Supported Superstructure
NCT03578913 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Dimensional Accuracy of Bre Flex and Peek for Removable Partial Dentures
NCT03025555 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Complications in Fixed All-On-Four Prosthesis Reinforced with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Versus Cobalt Chromium (Co-Cr) Framework
NCT06631573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Denture Base Materials
NCT06395116 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone
NCT03333889 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Metal Ceramic Fixed Dental Prostheses Using Two Porcelain Veneering Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07029880 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One-Tooth One-Time (1T1T) A Straightforward Approach to Replace Missing Teeth in the Posterior Region: a Case Series
NCT02898311 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA