MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Types of Splints to Treat Dental Luxation Injuries

NCT05305586 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 88

Last updated 2023-09-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objectives of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) were:

1. To compare the efficiency of splinting by two composite materials in terms of retention of material
2. To compare adhesive point dimension between the two groups
3. To compare time taken to place and remove the splint
4. To assess the efficacy of bulkfill flowable in reducing mobility of luxated teeth.

Conditions

  • Dental Trauma
  • Splints

Interventions

DEVICE

Splint retained by Bulk-fill flowable

Luxated teeth were splinted with bulk-fill flowable composite

DEVICE

Splint retained by Packable Composite

Luxated teeth were splinted with packable composite

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Dow University of Health Sciences

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Arshad Hasan, BDS, FCPS · Dow University of Health Sciences

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-07-09
Primary Completion
2020-04-20
Completion
2020-05-04

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05305586 on ClinicalTrials.gov