MedTrace Logo

Effects of the Herbst Appliance With Different Anchorages and Twin-Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion

NCT02411812 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-11-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the Herbst appliance with indirect skeletal anchorage in mini-implants is capable of preventing excessive inclination of the lower incisors at the end of the treatment when compared to the Herbst appliance with dental anchorage and Twin-Block appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion and overjet ≥ 6 mm.

Conditions

  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II

Interventions

DEVICE

Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage

Group treated with the Herbst appliance with indirect skeletal anchorage in mini-implants.

DEVICE

Herbst appliance with dental anchorage

Group treated with the conventional Herbst appliance with dental anchorage.

DEVICE

Twin-Block appliance

Group treated with Twin-Block appliance

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Klaus Barretto-Lopes

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Klaus B Lopes, PhD · Rio de Janeiro State University

  • Kevin D O'Brien, PhD · University of Manchester

  • José Augusto M Miguel, PhD · Rio de Janeiro State University

  • Nathália Palomares, MSc · Rio de Janeiro State University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
10 Years
Max Age
14 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-08-31
Primary Completion
2025-08-31
Completion
2025-09-30

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02411812 on ClinicalTrials.gov