Comparison of Efficacy of Three Orthodontic Appliances

NCT03450551 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 183

Last updated 2018-03-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To investigate each treatment modality in its "optimal" environment to avoid operator experience bias. Therefore we propose to operate out of three "specialist centres" with specific units providing one modality alone Which of the three orthodontic appliances does achieve best clinical progress, produce least discomfort to the patient, minimize the time taken for completion of treatment and maximize compliance.

Conditions

  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II

Interventions

DEVICE

Twin Block, Herbst, Frog distalising appliance

To study which of the three orthodontic appliances does achieve the best clinical progress, produce least discomfort to the patient, minimize the time taken for completion of treatment and maximize compliance.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dirk Bister, Consultant · Guy's and St Thomas NHS Trust

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
10 Years
Max Age
16 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-04-01
Primary Completion
2019-08-31
Completion
2019-08-31
FDA Device
Yes

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03450551 on ClinicalTrials.gov