the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
NCT05440526 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2022-07-01
Summary
the objective of the current study is to compare the dentofacial effects of the mini-plate anchored Herbst appliance Versus the dentally anchored Twin force bite corrector Appliance in Young Adult Class II Orthodontic Patients with retruded mandible.
Conditions
- Class II Malocclusion
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Herbst Group
Herbst Group: 1. Two mini plates are chosen, the last hole in every plate is used to solder the ball housing of type IV Herbst appliance. 2. The two mini plates are placed bilateral at the mandibular symphysis and fixed by at least 3 screws, the surgical wound is sutured. 3. The surgical wound is left for 2 weeks for proper soft tissue healing, in the meantime separation in the arch, band placement on the first premolar and molar bilateral followed by impression for construction of the upper Herbst splint.
- DEVICE
-
TFBC Group
TFBC Group: 1. The patients will be treated by fixed orthodontic appliance with using series of orthodontic NiTi arch wires for levelling and alignment. 2. Installation of series of orthodontic stainless steel arch wires until 0.0019 x 0.0025 inch for both arches. 3. Installation of the Twin Force Bite Corrector appliance for 4 to 6 months. 4. Using of class ΙΙ intra-oral elastics for both sides for 2 to 3 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Al-Azhar University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mahmoud M. Fathy Aboelmahasen, PHD · Lecturer of orthodontics - Faculty of dental medicine - Al-Azhar university
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 20 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-09-10
- Primary Completion
- 2022-03-08
- Completion
- 2022-04-15
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients
NCT03839303 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance
NCT05433051 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Skeletal Anchored Versus Incisal Capped Twin Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT06209086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Skeletally Anchored Herbst Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Due to Mandibular Retrusion
NCT04388046 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Twin Block Appliance in Incremental Versus Maximum Bite Advancement in Skeletal Class II
NCT04562545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Treatment for Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Twicare® and Herbst Removable Appliances
NCT02428621 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
NCT03764189 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modified Twin Block in Skeletal Class II Growing Females With Mandibular Deficiency
NCT03635463 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries
NCT07311785 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Measuring Rate of Anteriors Retraction With Two Different Techniques
NCT05542745 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Modified Fixed Twin Block Versus Removable Twin Block on Skeletal Class 2 Growing Patients With Mandibular Deficiency
NCT05993156 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Different Fixed Functional Appliances for Correction of Class II Malocclusion: A Comparative Clinical Study
NCT05555719 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Miniscrew Anchored Maxillary Protraction Protocols
NCT03712007 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Late Intermaxillary Elastics in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
NCT06232928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Three Orthodontic Appliances
NCT03450551 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Anchorage Control Using Arch Wire Stopper Versus Mini-Screws
NCT06416904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.
NCT06098885 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Modified Herbst Approach to Improve Chin Projection
NCT05597748 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of an Esthetic Twin Block for Patients With Mandibular Retrusion
NCT05418413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Extraction Vs Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment on Vertical Facial Dimension
NCT04151875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Sliding Jigs vs Retraction Hooks for Maxillary Dentition Distalization Using IZC Miniscrews"
NCT07307209 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA