Early Treatment for Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Twicare® and Herbst Removable Appliances
NCT02428621 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 62
Last updated 2018-02-09
Summary
The aim of this prospective, multicentric, randomized, open-label study is to assess the efficacy of the removable Twicare® as mandibular propulsive appliance in children aged from 7 to 12 years old in the course of their orthodontic treatment, showing its noninferiority with the removable Herbst. One untreated group will be included to control the internal validity of the study as recommend in noninferiority trials. Patients will have a follow-up every two months during 6 to 12 months as planned in routine care.
Conditions
- Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Twicare® appliance
Early orthodontic treatment with the Twicare®. The Class II treatment is initiated at the age of 7-12 years and continued as long as the Class I is achieved. The Twicare® is adjusted in mandibular protraction based on the 2/3 of the condylar test and was were worn during 12 to 14 hours a day (at least 4 hours during the day and all night).
- DEVICE
-
Removable Herbst appliance
Early orthodontic treatment with the removable Herbst appliance. The Class II treatment is initiated at the age of 7-12 years and continued as long as the Class I is achieved. The Herbst appliance is adjusted in mandibular protraction based on the 2/3 of the condylar test and was were worn during 12 to 14 hours a day (at least 4 hours during the day and all night).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
FCI System
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Stéphane Renaudin, Dr · Department of Othodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 7 Years
- Max Age
- 12 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-10-31
- Completion
- 2017-10-31
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Three Orthodontic Appliances
NCT03450551 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Removable Devices in Overjet Reduction
NCT06955637 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of the Herbst Appliance With Different Anchorages and Twin-Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT02411812 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Customized and Standard Facemasks for Early Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT06402656 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Two 3D Functional Appliances Herbst and Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA) on Posterior Airway Space And TMJ in Growing Class II Malocclusion Patients
NCT07094841 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Correction Study Using the Invisalign System
NCT02376829 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of the Effect oh the Carriere Motion 3D
NCT06785896 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Treatment of Class II Malocclusion With Excessive Overjet
NCT04508322 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Tow Mechanics for Total-maxillary-arch-distalization
NCT04814173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
TolTwiCare : Qualitative Evaluation Routine Care From Primary Tolerance of a Prefabricated and Removable Orthosis
NCT02907450 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.
NCT06098885 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Modified Herbst Approach to Improve Chin Projection
NCT05597748 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Carriere Motion Appliance* Versus In-office Sectional Appliance
NCT05204654 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
NCT06944860 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Skeletal Anchored Versus Incisal Capped Twin Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT06209086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Premolar Extraction vs Distalization: A Randomised Clinical Trial
NCT04743258 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Twin Block Appliance in Incremental Versus Maximum Bite Advancement in Skeletal Class II
NCT04562545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Two Different Appliances in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
NCT00957489 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients
NCT03839303 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
TADs Anchored vs Conventional Anchored Carriere Motion Appliance
NCT05631353 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of the Twin Block and Carriere Motion Appliances in Post-pubertal Patients and an Evaluation of the Impact of Class II Malocclusion and Its Correction on Oral Health-related Quality of Life
NCT07292636 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Airway Space After Distalization in Adults Using Carrière Motion Appliance
NCT05261217 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Modified Twin-Block Appliance With Clear Plates
NCT05950581 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Late Intermaxillary Elastics in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
NCT06232928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Survey on the Use of Removable Functional Appliances Among Patients Undergoing Treatment at the Orthodontic Unit of Nice University Hospital
NCT07127341 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING