the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored Semi-rigid One
NCT05466344 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2022-07-21
Summary
This study will be directed to evaluate The effect of two different types of fixed functional appliances on the temporomandibular joint.
Study design:
Prospective randomized clinical study.
Study setting and population:
This study will be conducted on twenty orthodontic patients. The number of patients was dependent on a power study.
Sample size calculation was based on the observed average effect size derived from previous article addressing "the effect of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD using miniplates for the treatment of Class II malocclusion
Conditions
- Class II Malocclusion
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Herbst Group
1. Two mini plates are chosen, the last hole in every plate is used to solder the ball housing of type IV Herbst appliance. 2. The two mini plates are placed bilateral at the mandibular symphysis and fixed by at least 3 screws, the surgical wound is sutured leaving an extended part of the plate in the oral cavity which contain the soldered ball housing. 3. The surgical wound is left for 2 weeks for proper soft tissue healing, in the meantime separation in the arch, band placement on the first premolar and molar bilateral followed by impression for construction of the upper Herbst splint. 4. Cementation of upper Herbst splint with connecting the telescopic piston through fitting of the plunger into the tube bilaterally. 5. When reactivation of the telescopic piston is needed, extension rings are used.
- DEVICE
-
TFBC Group
1. The patients will be treated by fixed orthodontic appliance with using series of orthodontic NiTi arch wires for levelling and alignment. 2. Installation of series of orthodontic stainless steel arch wires until 0.0019 x 0.0025 inch for both arches. 3. Installation of the Twin Force Bite Corrector appliance for 4 to 6 months. 4. Using of class ΙΙ intra-oral elastics for both sides for 2 to 3 months. 5. Finally follow finishing steps for each patient.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Al-Azhar University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mahmoud Fathy, PHD · Clinical professor of orthodontics - Faculty of dental medicine - Al-Azhar university
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 20 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-06-15
- Primary Completion
- 2022-03-10
- Completion
- 2022-04-15
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Appliance Effects on Mandibular Soft Tissues
NCT06935032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of the Herbst Appliance With Different Anchorages and Twin-Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT02411812 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of an Esthetic Twin Block for Patients With Mandibular Retrusion
NCT05418413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients
NCT03839303 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Skeletal Anchored Versus Incisal Capped Twin Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT06209086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Late Intermaxillary Elastics in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
NCT06232928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modified Twin Block in Skeletal Class II Growing Females With Mandibular Deficiency
NCT03635463 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Changes in TMJ by Twin Block Therapy in Skeletal Class II Div 2 Malocclusion in Adolescent Females : MRI Study"
NCT03481088 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance
NCT05433051 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries
NCT07311785 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Mini Plates Anchorage With Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device
NCT02475785 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dentoskeletal Effects of 3D-Printed Fixed Twin Block Versus MARA Appliances in Management of Skeletal Class II
NCT07340242 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Effects of Herbst Appliance in Skeletal Class II Cases During Prepubertal and Postpubertal Periods
NCT04518865 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dentoskeletal Changes Associated With Herbst Appliance Therapy
NCT02456220 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Occlusal Stabilization Splints Fabricated Using Conventional Versus Fully Digital Workflow
NCT07074340 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Conventional Versus 3D-Designed and Printed Stabilization Splints for Treatment of TMD Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT06781138 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three Dimensional Versus Standard Miniplate In Fixation Of Mandibular Angle Fracture- A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT01939015 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Stabilizing Splint (Michigan-type Occlusal Splint) Versus Anterior Repositioning Splint .
NCT02960048 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assesment of Tempromandibular Joint ( TMJ ) Changes After Treatment of Skeletal Class II Cases by Twinblock vs Monoblock Appliances
NCT07270653 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of CAD/CAM vs Conventionally Constructed Occlusal Splints in Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
NCT04591899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Measuring Rate of Anteriors Retraction With Two Different Techniques
NCT05542745 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Twin Block Appliance in Incremental Versus Maximum Bite Advancement in Skeletal Class II
NCT04562545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA