MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients

NCT03839303 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26

Last updated 2019-05-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare an Infra-zygomatic Mini implant supported appliance with headgear in distalization and intrusion of maxillary dentition for treatment of growing patients with class II malocclusion (maxillary excess)

Conditions

  • Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Interventions

DEVICE

Infra-zygomatic Mini Implant Supported Appliance

1. leveling and alignment of the four maxillary incisors 2. infra zygomatic mini-implant will be placed bilaterally 3. wire frame work that is designed resembling the inner bow of headgear will be adapted to the upper arch 4. a heavy arch wire engaging the 4 incisors will be attached to the wire frame work 5. orthopedic force will be delivered from the mini-implants to the wire frame work

DEVICE

high pull head gear

1. acrylic maxillary splint is made with flying tubes 2. high pull head gear is adapted to be inserted in the flying tubes

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ahmed Afifi · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
7 Years
Max Age
15 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-03-01
Primary Completion
2019-11-01
Completion
2019-12-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03839303 on ClinicalTrials.gov