MedTrace Logo

Study to Compare Two Functional Appliances for Class II Malocclusions

NCT03773783 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64

Last updated 2018-12-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of two functional appliances in the correction of a Class II malocclusion. (Class II malocclusions are where upper front teeth bite significantly further forward in relation to lower front teeth).

Null hypothesis:

There is no significant difference between the Button \& bead and Twin-block appliances with regard to time taken to reduce the overjet

Conditions

  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II

Interventions

DEVICE

Button and Bead appliance

Button and Bead appliance

DEVICE

Twin Block appliance

Twin Block appliance

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Birmingham

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Thomas Dietrich · University of Birmingham

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
10 Years
Max Age
14 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-07-10
Primary Completion
2019-07-31
Completion
2020-07-31

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03773783 on ClinicalTrials.gov