Distalization With Aligners: Anchorage Options
NCT06631131 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2025-02-05
Summary
Background: To compare the dentoskeletal effects of Class II elastic anchorage and infrazygomatic crest (IZC) miniscrew anchorage in sequential maxillary molar distalization using clear aligners.
Methods: A total of 22 patients with Angle Class II malocclusion treated with clear aligners and maxillary molar distalization were included. Based on the anchorage method patients were divided into two groups: Class II elastics (Group 1) or IZC miniscrews (Group 2). Lateral cephalometric radiographs and digital models were obtained from all patients before treatment (T0) and after distalization of the second premolars (T1) to assess skeletal and dental changes. Geomagic Control X was used to superimpose the digital models.
Conditions
- Class II Malocclusion
- Class II Malocclusion, Division 1
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Distalization with clear aligners supported by Class II elastics
Sequential distalization (50%) with clear aligners was planned in the maxillary arch for each patient. ). In group 1, with the beginning of the movement of the upper first molars, Class II intermaxillary elastics were used from precision cuts of the upper canines to the buttons on the lower first molars for supporting distalization movement.
- DEVICE
-
Distalization with clear aligners supported by miniscrew
Sequential distalization (50%) with clear aligners was planned in the maxillary arch for each patient. In group 2, IZC miniscrews were inserted in the IZC region between the upper molars in both sides before first molar movement started. The same intramaxillary elastics were used from precision cuts of the upper canines to the IZC miniscrew for supporting distalization movement.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Bezmialem Vakif University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ezgi Sunal Aktürk, Assistant professor · University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics
-
Ezgi Kösen, PhD student · Bezmialem Vakif University,Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Orthodontics,
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Max Age
- 25 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-12-30
- Primary Completion
- 2023-08-30
- Completion
- 2023-12-26
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy
NCT05684510 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Different Activation Protocols of Hycon Device and Vibration Stimulation on Canine Teeth Distalization
NCT03968263 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of the Herbst Appliance With Different Anchorages and Twin-Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT02411812 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Printed Orthodontic Molar Distalizer
NCT07191158 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of IPR and Attachments on Rotational Tooth Movement in Clear Aligner Therapy
NCT07053189 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Customized Attachment Composites in Clear Aligner Therapy
NCT07261735 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of the Quantity of Distal Movement of the Upper Canine and Molar
NCT01654419 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficiency of Clear Aligners in Maxillary Molar Distalization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT06330571 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients
NCT03839303 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Rigid Versus Non-rigid Indirect Anchorage During Canine Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Study
NCT06554769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Therapeutic Effects of Class II Elastics on Aligners in Different Vertical Skeletal Patterns
NCT05853211 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
The Effect of Patient Preference on Retention Success
NCT06478771 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the I-arch System During the Initial Stage of Orthodontic Treatment
NCT07264127 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Distalization and Functional Appliance Therapy
NCT03252782 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Sequential Distalization Versus Class III Elastics With Clear Aligners in Class III Patients
NCT06859606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Discomfort Perceived by a Cohort of Patients Treated With Aligners and Attachments Placed According to Two Different Protocols
NCT06218641 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-implant-supported Twin-Block in Treating Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
NCT06403033 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Of Different Orthodontic Aligner Systems Applied On Single Stage And Three Stage
NCT04678596 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Removable Appliances and Clear Aligners in Early Orthodontic Treatments During the Mixed Dentition Period
NCT07331090 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage
NCT06507319 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Miniscrews as Anchorage Device for Orthodontic Treatment
NCT02644811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Distalization of Maxillary First and Second Molars Between a Miniscrew Implant Supported Device and Clear Aligners.
NCT07040176 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"Sliding Jigs vs Retraction Hooks for Maxillary Dentition Distalization Using IZC Miniscrews"
NCT07307209 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Clear Aligners and Metal Brackets on Nutritional Status
NCT05936463 ·Status: UNKNOWN