TADs Anchored vs Conventional Anchored Carriere Motion Appliance
NCT05631353 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2024-07-03
Summary
Carriere Motion appliance (CMA) was designed to correct a Class II molar relationship into a Class I relationship by distalizing the whole posterior maxillary segment by means of class II elastics and mandibular anchorage. To revoke the adverse effects of CMA with class II elastics, we can use the CMA to distalize the maxillary posterior segment with TADs anchorage using miniscrews. The aim of this study is to evaluate TADs anchored CMA vs. conventionally anchored CMA for distalization of the maxillary buccal segment.
Conditions
- Class II Malocclusion
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Carriere Motion Appliance
Patient will be randomly allocated into two groups: Group I: conventional mandibular anchorage using passive lingual arch. Group II: anchorage by direct mini-screws. In the group I, Class II elastics will be attached from the maxillary canine to the mandibular first molar bilaterally with passive lingual arch in the lower arch as anchorage means. In the group I, Class II elastics will be attached from the maxillary canine to mandiular miniscrews bilaterally. For each patient, two CBCT radiographs will be obtained: one preoperatively and another after completion of distalization.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Al-Azhar University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Saleh Anwar El-sayed, professor · [email protected]
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 11 Years
- Max Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-01
- Completion
- 2024-04-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of the Effect oh the Carriere Motion 3D
NCT06785896 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Treatment Effects of Herbst Appliance in Skeletal Class II Cases During Prepubertal and Postpubertal Periods
NCT04518865 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
NCT05440526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.
NCT06098885 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effect of the New Hybrid Aesthetic Functional Appliance
NCT06209125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients
NCT03839303 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Late Intermaxillary Elastics in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
NCT06232928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
NCT04988373 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Treatment for Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Twicare® and Herbst Removable Appliances
NCT02428621 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Modified Twin-Block Appliance With Clear Plates
NCT05950581 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Myofunctional Appliances
NCT05371691 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of the Herbst Appliance With Different Anchorages and Twin-Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT02411812 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ethically Accepted With Code 851/2971 A Comparison of Class Ⅱ Malocclusion Treatment Using Van Beek-headgear Activator Versus Andresen Activator
NCT05604625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of the Twin Block and Carriere Motion Appliances in Post-pubertal Patients and an Evaluation of the Impact of Class II Malocclusion and Its Correction on Oral Health-related Quality of Life
NCT07292636 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics During Maxillary En-masse Retraction in Adult Patients
NCT03261024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Printed Orthodontic Molar Distalizer
NCT07191158 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Modified Functional Appliance With Expander
NCT06116500 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Acceleration of Lower Anterior Teeth Leveling and Alignment Using Corticision
NCT03310086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Distal Movement of Maxillary Dentition With Zygomatic Miniplates Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
NCT03467555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment With Clear Aligner
NCT06410105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Tow Mechanics for Total-maxillary-arch-distalization
NCT04814173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Investigating Tooth Movements With Conventional and Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Supported Fixed Appliances
NCT00871091 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA