MedTrace Logo

Skeletally Versus Dentally Anchored Herbst Appliance

NCT04402164 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2020-05-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion can be carried out through different approaches. One of these is the using of Fixed Functional Appliances (FFA), one of main drawbacks of these appliances is the proclination of the lower anterior teeth limiting the skeletal effect that is originally addressed in those patients.To overcome these limitations, miniplates anchored Forsus FRD were introduced, it showed high success rate in achieving a more skeletal effect with retroclination of lower anterior teeth rather than their proclination. Although Herbst appliance is categorized as the best FFA with more stable skeletal and dentoalveolar effects, miniplates had never been tried as an anchorage source with Herbst appliance in skeletal Class II patients.

Conditions

  • Angle Class II, Division 1

Interventions

DEVICE

Herbst appliance

telescopic appliance for mandibular advancement

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Al-Azhar University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Al-Dany A. Mohamed, Prof · Al-Azhar University

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
14 Years
Max Age
20 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-03-01
Primary Completion
2019-11-01
Completion
2020-01-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04402164 on ClinicalTrials.gov