Comparison of Two Novel Indirect Laryngoscopes to the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization.
NCT01032460 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2010-11-09
Summary
It is essential that anaesthetists successfully perform orotracheal intubation in scenarios in which intubation is potentially more difficult, such as where the neck is immobilized.
The Airtraq® Laryngoscope and the CMAC are new intubating devices. They are designed to provide a view of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes.
These devices may be especially effective in situations where intubation of the trachea is potentially difficult.
The efficacy of these devices in comparison to the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope in situations where the cervical spine is immobilized is not known.
The investigators aim to compare the performances of the Airtraq® Laryngoscope and the CMAC to that of the Macintosh laryngoscope, the gold standard device, in patients in which the cervical spine has been immobilized by means of a Manual in-line stabilization of the spine.
Hypothesis: The primary hypothesis is that, in the hands of experienced anaesthetists, time to intubation would be shorter using the indirect laryngoscopes, than using the Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated difficult laryngoscopy.
Conditions
- Immobilization
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
intubate with the macintosh laryngoscope
intubate with the macintosh laryngoscope
- DEVICE
-
intubate with the C-MAC laryngoscope
intubate with the C-MAC laryngoscope
- DEVICE
-
intubate with the Airtraq device
intubate with the Airtraq device
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University College Hospital Galway
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-11-30
- Completion
- 2010-11-30
Countries
- Ireland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Indirect Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT00910156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Intubation and Cervical Spine Motion
NCT03567902 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Airway Devices in Nasotracheal Intubation in Manikin
NCT01311284 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC vs Airtraq) for Awake Intubation
NCT05428995 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway Management
NCT02395406 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Types and The Cervical Motion
NCT02191904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study of Airtraq Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation by First Year Resident
NCT04386356 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Airtraq Mobile to Improve Intubation Conditions With Airtraq
NCT02510924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Laryngoscopy During Cervical Trauma
NCT02292693 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Face-to-face Tracheal Intubation: a Comparison of Airtraq, Glidescope and Fastrach
NCT02286570 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Endotracheal Intubation in Prehospital Scenario
NCT02681835 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
NCT00602979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of C-Mac D Blade and Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway on Cervical Spine Motion Conditions
NCT03115606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation of Patients With an Unstable Cervical Spine Using the CMAC Device
NCT01113723 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation: Video Laryngoscope vs Rigid Video Stylet
NCT03120546 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient
NCT04833166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Glottic Visualization & Ease of Intubation With Different Laryngoscope Blades
NCT01352299 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management
NCT02395419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope vs Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Patients With Cervical Immobilization
NCT03759561 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopy in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilisation
NCT02563301 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations
NCT02305667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01814176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
NCT02769221 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
NCT02210338 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA