Comparison of AirTraq Laryngoscope to Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation of Patients With Potential Cervical Spine Injury
NCT00664612 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2008-10-16
Summary
Intubation is frequently required for trauma patients as part of the resuscitative effort. When the stability of the cervical spine is unknown, the potential for spinal cord damage during intubation is significant; the question of the safest intubating technique has not been resolved. Previous Studies have evaluated Macintosh Laryngoscopy, Bullard Laryngoscope, face mask ventilation, fibre-optic guided oral and nasal intubation, esophageal Combitube®, Laryngeal Mask Airway® (LMA), and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway® (ILMA) use with respect to cervical spine movement. Our previous study evaluated the Intubating Lighted Stylet (Lightwand®) and GlideScope® versus the Macintosh Laryngoscope.
Another method of securing endotracheal intubation, approved and in routine use, is the AirTraq® videolaryngoscope (ProMedic, Inc, Bonita Springs, FL, USA). The AirTraq videolaryngoscope is a videolaryngoscope with an external video display of the glottic opening and an endotracheal tube track to guide the ETT through the vocal cords (www.airtraq.com). When a clear view of the vocal cords is obtained, the endotracheal tube may be advanced into the trachea. This technique can be performed rapidly and safely and there is the perception that it involves less cervical spine movement than direct laryngoscopy.
We propose to study the AirTraq videolaryngoscope to determine if its use would result in reduced cervical spine movement during intubation.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
AirTraq
Laryngoscopy with AirTraq
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Timothy P Turkstra, MD · Western University, Canada
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2008-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2008-05-31
- Completion
- 2008-05-31
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Video Stylet vs. Flexible Bronchoscopy for C-Spine
NCT03992092 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Intubation in Prehospital Scenario
NCT02681835 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope vs Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Patients With Cervical Immobilization
NCT03759561 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
NCT02210338 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopy During Child Intubation
NCT02289664 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Cervical Injury
NCT05619965 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation: Video Laryngoscope vs Rigid Video Stylet
NCT03120546 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Laryngoscopes in Difficult Laryngoscopy
NCT02387502 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
NCT02769221 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation of Patients With an Unstable Cervical Spine Using the CMAC Device
NCT01113723 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
ETI During Spinal Trauma
NCT02295631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Face-to-face Tracheal Intubation: a Comparison of Airtraq, Glidescope and Fastrach
NCT02286570 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient
NCT04833166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope-assisted Lightwand Intubation and Cervical Spine Motion
NCT02430415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02277951 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of C-Mac D Blade and Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway on Cervical Spine Motion Conditions
NCT03115606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pediatric Intubation
NCT02289872 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Child Intubation
NCT02289638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
C-Spine Movement - Shikani Optical Scope vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Patients With Cervical Spine Injury
NCT00310999 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Types and The Cervical Motion
NCT02191904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Immobilized Cervical Spine
NCT01210092 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
C-MAC VS Clinical Observation
NCT03856398 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
A Comparison of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children With Torticollis
NCT03582787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation During Spinal Immobilization
NCT02733536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopy During CPR for Trauma Patients
NCT03252886 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA