MedTrace Logo

Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope vs Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Patients With Cervical Immobilization

NCT03759561 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 340

Last updated 2022-10-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In patients with suspected cervical spine injury, cervical immobilization, such as manual in-line stabilization or cervical collar has been adopted to prevent further neurologic injury due to cervical motion. In these patients, tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy is often challenging due to limited mouth opening, neck flexion, and head extension. In this situation, videolaryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope have been used for tracheal intubation in such patients. In this study, the initial success rate of tracheal intubation and intubation time between the videolaryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope will be compared.

Conditions

  • Intubation, Intratracheal

Interventions

PROCEDURE

intubation with videolaryngoscope vs fiberoptic bronchoscope

Tracheal intubation was performed using either videolaryngoscope or fiberoptic bronchoscope under cervical collar application according to the group allocations

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hee-pyoung Park, MD,PhD · Seoul National University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-12-14
Primary Completion
2022-01-17
Completion
2022-01-18

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03759561 on ClinicalTrials.gov