Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient

NCT04833166 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104

Last updated 2022-09-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Direct laryngoscope requires proper alignment of the oro-pharyngeal-laryngeal axis to provide an optimal glottic view for intubation. However, in cervical spine patients, this alignment is not possible thus resulting in an increased risk of fail intubations.

D-blade comes with an elliptically tapered blade shape rising at the distal end to provide better glottic visualization in comparison with direct laryngoscopes. Hence, CMAC D-blade is preferred in simulated cervical spine injury where intubator needs to maintain a neutral neck position. However, intubation time may be significantly longer due to difficulty in negotiating the endotracheal tube pass vocal cord and impingement of endotracheal tube to the anterior wall of trachea.

There is a study published Glidescope which is also a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope suggested that obtaining a partial glottic view of larynx may facilitate a faster and easier tracheal intubation when compare to a full glottis view. The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate the time of tracheal intubation in relation to the full glottic view vs. partial glottic view which is deliberately obtained when using CMAC D-blade video laryngoscopy in simulated cervical spine injury.

Conditions

  • Intubation; Difficult or Failed
  • Airway Complication of Anesthesia

Interventions

DEVICE

CMAC D-blade videolaryngoscope with full or partial glottic view

Deliberate achieving full or partial glottic view on C MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and comparing time and ease of intubation with both arms

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Malaya

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Siu Min Lim, MMed Master · University of Malaya

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-05-25
Primary Completion
2022-02-24
Completion
2022-02-24

Countries

  • Malaysia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04833166 on ClinicalTrials.gov