Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient
NCT04833166 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104
Last updated 2022-09-13
Summary
Direct laryngoscope requires proper alignment of the oro-pharyngeal-laryngeal axis to provide an optimal glottic view for intubation. However, in cervical spine patients, this alignment is not possible thus resulting in an increased risk of fail intubations.
D-blade comes with an elliptically tapered blade shape rising at the distal end to provide better glottic visualization in comparison with direct laryngoscopes. Hence, CMAC D-blade is preferred in simulated cervical spine injury where intubator needs to maintain a neutral neck position. However, intubation time may be significantly longer due to difficulty in negotiating the endotracheal tube pass vocal cord and impingement of endotracheal tube to the anterior wall of trachea.
There is a study published Glidescope which is also a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope suggested that obtaining a partial glottic view of larynx may facilitate a faster and easier tracheal intubation when compare to a full glottis view. The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate the time of tracheal intubation in relation to the full glottic view vs. partial glottic view which is deliberately obtained when using CMAC D-blade video laryngoscopy in simulated cervical spine injury.
Conditions
- Intubation; Difficult or Failed
- Airway Complication of Anesthesia
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
CMAC D-blade videolaryngoscope with full or partial glottic view
Deliberate achieving full or partial glottic view on C MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and comparing time and ease of intubation with both arms
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Malaya
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Siu Min Lim, MMed Master · University of Malaya
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-05-25
- Primary Completion
- 2022-02-24
- Completion
- 2022-02-24
Countries
- Malaysia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Two Novel Indirect Laryngoscopes to the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization.
NCT01032460 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.
NCT03230422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Laryngoscopy During Cervical Trauma
NCT02292693 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of AirTraq Laryngoscope to Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation of Patients With Potential Cervical Spine Injury
NCT00664612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Lightwand Intubation Versus Video-laryngoscope Guided Lightwand Intubation in Simulated Cervical Spine-immobilized Patients
NCT03169556 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Immobilized Cervical Spine
NCT01210092 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Neutral Position Facilitates Orotracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopes
NCT04858906 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation of Patients With an Unstable Cervical Spine Using the CMAC Device
NCT01113723 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
NCT02769221 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope for Double-Lumen Intubation
NCT07284251 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
NCT02210338 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 3 Direct Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT02955511 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients
NCT04145089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope vs Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Patients With Cervical Immobilization
NCT03759561 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC Blade D Video Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion
NCT06759038 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Management Study to Evaluate the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope as an Alternative to the Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT01122433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Of Videolaryngoscopes In Double Lumen Tube
NCT03826706 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Blades of Videolaryngoscope in Simulated Difficult Airway in Children
NCT03719638 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC D-Blade vs Macintosh for Postoperative Vocal Cord Evaluation
NCT07277985 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vocal Cord Views With the Classical Miller, Wis-Hipple and C-MAC Size 1 Blades in Young Children
NCT03053583 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT00992628 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tracheal Intubation With Collar Immobilisation : a Comparison of Glidescope and Fastrach
NCT02245880 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison by Neuromonitoring of Two Techniques of Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Unstable Cervical Spine
NCT02382887 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope-assisted Lightwand Intubation and Cervical Spine Motion
NCT02430415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA