MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope

NCT02210338 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64

Last updated 2016-04-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study aims to determine the better device to facilitate intubation in patients with a limited neck movement and small mouth opening. This may help anesthesiology as well as emergency medicine practitioners and departments to decide when choosing between these two conceptually similar device. The hypothesis to be tested is that the C-MAC® is more superior when compared to the Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope in success of intubation, time to intubation and complication rate in patients with a fixed cervical collar.

Conditions

  • Intubation
  • Airway

Interventions

DEVICE

Karl Storz C-MAC

DEVICE

Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Singapore General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Theodore GL Wong · Singapore General Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-08-31
Primary Completion
2016-12-31
Completion
2017-03-31

Countries

  • Singapore

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02210338 on ClinicalTrials.gov