Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices

NCT00602979 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 240

Last updated 2017-05-19

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The placement of endotracheal tubes (intubation) is a physiologically stressful procedure for patients. Laryngoscopes are devices-typically composed of a blade attached to a handle with a light source-that allow examination of the upper airway through the mouth, often for the purposes of intubation. Recently some new laryngoscope devices (including the Airtraq® Optical Laryngoscope, the Storz DCI Video laryngoscope®, McGRATH® Video Laryngoscope, and the GlideScope®) have been developed, which may either decrease the stress related to intubation (reduce neck extension, reduce risk of complications or reduce time elapsed during intubation) or improve intubation success (reduce the number of attempts at intubating). Data are being collected in this study to determine which of these commonly-used devices may be better, particularly in comparison to the current hospital standard, the Macintosh laryngoscope. All of the devices to be used in this study are currently cleared or exempt by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Conditions

  • Laryngoscopy
  • Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

Macintosh laryngoscope

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation.

DEVICE

Airtraq® Optical Laryngoscope

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation.

DEVICE

Storz DCI Video Laryngoscope®

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

DEVICE

GlideScope® Video Laryngoscope

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

DEVICE

McGRATH® Video Laryngoscope

Used during laryngoscopy to facilitate intubation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • King Systems Corporation

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc.

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jon Samuels, MD · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-04-30
Primary Completion
2009-09-30
Completion
2011-07-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00602979 on ClinicalTrials.gov