MedTrace Logo

Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope

NCT02769221 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 370

Last updated 2016-05-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compare the intubation success rate between video laryngoscope and rigid video stylet in cervical spine surgery patients. Half of patients will receive endotracheal intubation by video laryngscope, other half of patients will receive endotracheal intubation by rigid video laryngoscope.

Conditions

  • Intubation, Intratracheal

Interventions

DEVICE

Rigid video stylet

DEVICE

Video laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hee-Pyoung Park, MD, PhD · Seoul National University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-06-30
Primary Completion
2017-06-30
Completion
2018-06-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02769221 on ClinicalTrials.gov