MedTrace Logo

A Comparative Study of Airtraq Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation by First Year Resident

NCT04386356 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2020-05-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study evaluates the learning and performance of tracheal intubation by first year anaesthesia trainee in Nepalese population using either Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes.

Conditions

  • Intubation; Difficult or Failed
  • Intubation Complication

Interventions

DEVICE

Orotracheal intubation with either Macintosh laryngoscope versus Airtraq video laryngoscope

Tracheal intubation will be performed by first year anaesthesia trainee using either Macintosh laryngoscope or Airtraq video laryngoscope according to the randomization sequence supervised by an experienced anaesthesiologist and data recorded by an independent observer on one group of patients.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Sabin Bhandari, MD · Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-02-01
Primary Completion
2020-08-01
Completion
2020-12-01
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Nepal

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04386356 on ClinicalTrials.gov