CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation.
NCT01031940 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 15
Last updated 2012-06-19
Summary
It is essential that anaesthetists successfully perform orotracheal intubation in scenarios in which intubation is potentially more difficult, such as where anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation are present.
The CMAC® Laryngoscope is a new intubating device. It is designed to provide a view of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes.
The CMAC may be especially effective in situations where intubation of the trachea is potentially difficult.
The efficacy of this device in comparison to the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope and other novel laryngoscopes is not known.
We aim to compare its performance to that of the Macintosh laryngoscope, the gold standard device, in patients with one or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation.
The investigators further aim to compare it to the Airtraq® device a device which has been shown to be superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope in previous trials.
The investigators primary hypothesis is that, in the hands of experienced anaesthetists, time to intubation would be shorter using the CMAC than using the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with two or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation.
The investigators further hypothesize that the Airtraq® will be superior the CMAC® with one or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation.
Conditions
- Airway
- Difficult Intubation
- Airway Device
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
macintosh laryngoscope
intubate with the macintosh laryngoscope
- DEVICE
-
C-MAC laryngoscope
intubate with the C-MAC laryngoscope
- DEVICE
-
Airtraq device
intubate with the Airtraq device
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University College Hospital Galway
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2011-03-31
- Completion
- 2011-03-31
Countries
- Ireland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of McGrath Series 5 and Airtraq Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Tube (DLT) Intubation
NCT02329041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
NCT00602979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Face-to-face Tracheal Intubation: a Comparison of Airtraq, Glidescope and Fastrach
NCT02286570 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope
NCT02250521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airway
NCT02640196 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Intubation in Prehospital Scenario
NCT02681835 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Of Videolaryngoscopes In Double Lumen Tube
NCT03826706 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
NCT04759300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room
NCT05850260 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Double-lumen Tubes Intubation: Airtraq VS Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT03653910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Macintosh Versus GlideScope Versus C-MAC for Double Lumen Endotracheal Intubation
NCT05091281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway Management
NCT02395406 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
NCT03887897 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT04936516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?
NCT04850976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Using Macintosh vs.Hyperangulated Blades in Patients With Expected Difficult Intubation
NCT05522049 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
NCT02210338 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for DLT Intubation in Thoracic Surgery Patients.
NCT05988736 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Laryngoscopes in Difficult Laryngoscopy
NCT02387502 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopy Compared to Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT04794764 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope for Double-Lumen Intubation
NCT07284251 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope by Experienced Anesthesiologists
NCT01917565 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence Intubation
NCT05850052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA