Glottic Visualization & Ease of Intubation With Different Laryngoscope Blades
NCT01352299 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2011-05-11
Summary
Orotracheal intubation the commonest method used to secure and maintain airway during anaesthesia. A variety of methods are available for orotracheal intubation such as digital or tactile method, use of lighted orotracheal intubating stylet, use of intubating LMA (which is becoming increasing popular, particularly in cased of anticipated difficult intubation), fibreoptic endoscopic orotracheal intubation (also used when a difficulty is predicted), and conventional and most common method, direct laryngoscopy. Orotracheal intubation is most commonly achieved after visualization of laryngeal inlet with direct laryngoscopy following induction of general anaesthesia and muscle relaxation achieved by administration of a muscle relaxant.
Due to the hazards seen with failed intubation, anaesthetists are also on the lookout for techniques which will improve visualization of the laryngeal inlet, i.e. glottis. View obtained during laryngoscopy can be classified in a variety of ways such as Cormack Lehane grading, the percentage of glottic opening (POGO Score)Literature suggests that straight blade gives better glottic visualization while tracheal intubation is easier with the curved blade. We therefore wanted to compare the Macintosh and Miller laryngoscope blades in terms of visualization of Laryngeal inlet and ease of intubation in patients with normal predicted intubation. We also compared the McCoy blade, a modified curved blade, and the Trueview Laryngoscope, which incorporates a prism in a straight blade, for glottic view and ease of intubation.
Conditions
- Tracheal Intubation Morbidity
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Macintosh Laryngoscope blade
Laryngoscopy performed with Macintosh Laryngoscope
- DEVICE
-
MacCoy
Laryngoscopy performed with MacCoy Laryngoscope
- DEVICE
-
Miller
Laryngoscopy performed with Miller Laryngoscope
- DEVICE
-
TrueView
Laryngoscopy performed with TrueView laryngoscope
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tata Memorial Hospital
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Atul P Kulkarni, MD Anaes · Professor Tata Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2008-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2008-10-31
- Completion
- 2008-10-31
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Intubation Rate of Macintosh Size 2 and 3 Blades in Asian Female: a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT04566224 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Miller Straight Blade vs Macintosh Blade
NCT02664532 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Obese Patients
NCT03106974 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscope vs. Video Stylet During General Anesthesia With Obesity Patient
NCT05006651 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Laryngoscopic View to Enable GlideScope-assisted Tracheal Intubation
NCT02144207 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
NCT00602979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01814176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management
NCT02395419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Prototype Tested Against the Traditional Macintosh Blade
NCT00378170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Novel Indirect Laryngoscopes to the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization.
NCT01032460 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway Management
NCT02395406 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management
NCT02395445 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Intubation Using Macintosh Laryngoscope, Glidescope, Airwayscope During Chest Compression With Adjustment Height of a Bed
NCT02074098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation
NCT03514745 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
GlideScope Versus Direct Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation
NCT01235065 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Macintosh Blade Size for Endotracheal Intubation in Operative Rooms
NCT06232837 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Direct Laryngoscopy During Cervical Trauma
NCT02292693 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
NCT04948294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and VS-CMAC Fiberoptic Stylet for Awake Endoscopic Intubation in Predicted Difficult Airways
NCT04532138 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endotrol-tracheal Tube Assisted Endotracheal Intubation During Video Laryngoscopy
NCT01099969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video-stylet for Nasotracheal Intubation in Limited Mouth Opening Patient
NCT01917435 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Lightwand Intubation Versus Video-laryngoscope Guided Lightwand Intubation in Simulated Cervical Spine-immobilized Patients
NCT03169556 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway
NCT02395432 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT00910156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4